IREK – AESM: Institutional Repository of Economic Knowledge

From Policy to Impact: Ranking Green Finance Instruments for Sustainable Development Goals Achievement

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Doras (Lisnic), Anastasia
dc.contributor.author Criste, Cristina
dc.contributor.author VOICU, Cristina - Elena
dc.contributor.author Lobonț, Oana Ramona
dc.date.accessioned 2026-07-06T07:12:38Z
dc.date.available 2026-07-06T07:12:38Z
dc.date.issued 2026
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-182-29-4 (PDF)
dc.identifier.uri https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/5131
dc.description DORAȘ (LISNIC), Anastasia; Cristina CRISTE; Cristina-Elena VOICU and Oana Ramona LOBONȚ. From Policy to Impact: Ranking Green Finance Instruments for Sustainable Development Goals Achievement. Online. In: Development Through Research and Innovation IDSC-2026: International Scientific Conference: The 7th Edition, May 15-16th, 2026: Collection of scientific articles. Chişinău: SEP ASEM, 2026, pp. 374-388. ISBN 978-9975-182-29-4 (PDF). Disponibil: https://doi.org/10.53486/dri2026.49 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study proposes identifying and ranking the most effective green finance strategies to support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, using a multi-criteria analysis method (TOPSIS) applied to environmental, economic, and social performance criteria. The dataset is based on a constructed evaluation matrix that assesses six green finance instruments across five performance criteria: environmental impact, private capital mobilisation, economic efficiency, institutional feasibility, and social equity. Scores were assigned using a scale from 1 to 10, based on recent empirical studies and policy reports. The findings suggest that carbon market mechanisms achieve the highest performance, mainly due to their strong economic efficiency and their ability to mobilise private capital. Green investment funds and guarantee instruments also perform strongly, as they effectively attract resources and reduce investment risks. In contrast, green bonds and financial regulations are moderately effective due to their indirect or limited impact on capital mobilisation. Subsidies remain important for early-stage transitions but raise concerns related to fiscal sustainability. The results suggest that no single green finance instrument is sufficient to address the multi-dimensional challenges of sustainable development. Instead, an integrated approach that combines market-based instruments, public support mechanisms, and regulatory frameworks is required. Such a balanced policy mix allows the strengths of each instrument to complement one another, thereby enhancing overall effectiveness, reducing trade-offs across criteria, and accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. UDC: [005.35+336.02+336.52]:502.131.1; JEL: Q56, Q58, G28 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SEP ASEM en_US
dc.subject green finance en_US
dc.subject sustainable development goals en_US
dc.subject SDG en_US
dc.subject TOPSIS en_US
dc.subject carbon pricing en_US
dc.subject green financial instruments en_US
dc.title From Policy to Impact: Ranking Green Finance Instruments for Sustainable Development Goals Achievement en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account