Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/4688
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBazhenov, Sergey-
dc.contributor.authorBazhenova, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorAbrosimov, Dmitry-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-17T11:08:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-17T11:08:42Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/4688-
dc.descriptionBAZHENOV, Sergey; Elena BAZHENOVA and Dmitry ABROSIMOV. Geostrategy of Digital Threats. Online. In: Technological Innovations in Digital Security: Proceedings of the First Edition of the International Conference, Chişinău, May 15-16, 2025. Chişinău: SEP ASEM, 2025, pp. 232-243. ISBN 978-9975-168-48-9 (PDF). Disponibil: https://doi.org/10.53486/tids2025.28en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the transformation of digital threats into instruments of geostrategy, positioning cyberspace as a critical "fifth domain" of global power competition. Through a systematic analysis of the evolution, actors, tactics, and impacts of state-sponsored and non-state cyber operations, the study reveals how digital threats have shifted from technical disruptions to core elements of national security strategy. Key findings indicate: (1) Geopolitical drivers, including inter- state rivalry, technological dependency, and asymmetric advantages, fuel the weaponization of cyberspace; (2) State and non-state actors (e.g., cyber powers like the U.S., China, Russia; proxy groups; criminal syndicates) exploit tactics such as APTs, critical infrastructure sabotage, disinformation, and ransomware to achieve strategic goals; (3) Systemic consequences include the erosion of strategic stability, blurring of war/peace thresholds ("gray zone" conflicts), vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, and challenges to international law and norms; (4) Regulatory fragmentation persists, with voluntary norms (UN GGE) lacking enforcement, while states prioritize national resilience, offensive cyber capabilities, and coalitional deterrence. The study concludes that digital threats now constitute a central destabilizing factor in international relations, demanding urgent multilateral cooperation to establish binding rules, foster trust, and invest in next-generation security technologies (AI, post-quantum cryptography). Without a paradigm shift toward collaborative governance, persistent cyber competition risks systemic global instability. UDC: [004.056:005.21]:[32.019.5+327.8]; JEL: F52, O33, H56, K24en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSEP ASEMen_US
dc.subjectgeostrategyen_US
dc.subjectdigital threatsen_US
dc.subjectcybersecurityen_US
dc.subjectinternational securityen_US
dc.subjecthybrid conflictsen_US
dc.subjectcyber resilienceen_US
dc.subjectdeterrenceen_US
dc.subjectcyberspace governanceen_US
dc.titleGeostrategy of Digital Threatsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2.Articole

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TEHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN DIGITAL SECURITY_pp232-243.pdf500.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.