Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/4688Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bazhenov, Sergey | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bazhenova, Elena | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Abrosimov, Dmitry | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-17T11:08:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-17T11:08:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/4688 | - |
| dc.description | BAZHENOV, Sergey; Elena BAZHENOVA and Dmitry ABROSIMOV. Geostrategy of Digital Threats. Online. In: Technological Innovations in Digital Security: Proceedings of the First Edition of the International Conference, Chişinău, May 15-16, 2025. Chişinău: SEP ASEM, 2025, pp. 232-243. ISBN 978-9975-168-48-9 (PDF). Disponibil: https://doi.org/10.53486/tids2025.28 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines the transformation of digital threats into instruments of geostrategy, positioning cyberspace as a critical "fifth domain" of global power competition. Through a systematic analysis of the evolution, actors, tactics, and impacts of state-sponsored and non-state cyber operations, the study reveals how digital threats have shifted from technical disruptions to core elements of national security strategy. Key findings indicate: (1) Geopolitical drivers, including inter- state rivalry, technological dependency, and asymmetric advantages, fuel the weaponization of cyberspace; (2) State and non-state actors (e.g., cyber powers like the U.S., China, Russia; proxy groups; criminal syndicates) exploit tactics such as APTs, critical infrastructure sabotage, disinformation, and ransomware to achieve strategic goals; (3) Systemic consequences include the erosion of strategic stability, blurring of war/peace thresholds ("gray zone" conflicts), vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, and challenges to international law and norms; (4) Regulatory fragmentation persists, with voluntary norms (UN GGE) lacking enforcement, while states prioritize national resilience, offensive cyber capabilities, and coalitional deterrence. The study concludes that digital threats now constitute a central destabilizing factor in international relations, demanding urgent multilateral cooperation to establish binding rules, foster trust, and invest in next-generation security technologies (AI, post-quantum cryptography). Without a paradigm shift toward collaborative governance, persistent cyber competition risks systemic global instability. UDC: [004.056:005.21]:[32.019.5+327.8]; JEL: F52, O33, H56, K24 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | SEP ASEM | en_US |
| dc.subject | geostrategy | en_US |
| dc.subject | digital threats | en_US |
| dc.subject | cybersecurity | en_US |
| dc.subject | international security | en_US |
| dc.subject | hybrid conflicts | en_US |
| dc.subject | cyber resilience | en_US |
| dc.subject | deterrence | en_US |
| dc.subject | cyberspace governance | en_US |
| dc.title | Geostrategy of Digital Threats | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | 2.Articole | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN DIGITAL SECURITY_pp232-243.pdf | 500.34 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.