Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/1234567890/1237
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gherasim, Ioan Alexandru | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-09T08:57:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-09T08:57:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2537-6179; 1857-436X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://irek.ase.md:80/xmlui/handle/1234567890/1237 | - |
dc.description | GHERASIM, Ioan Alexandru. Some Notes on the Geopolitics and Geo-economics of Russia’s Post-Soviet Neocolonialism in Central Asia. Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies. June 2020, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 87-101. ISSN 2537-6179; E-ISSN 1857-436X. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The subject of “colonialism”, which is linked to a rather long stage in the evolution of civilization, continues to arouse the interest of various theorists and historians in the field of international relations, all the more that the concept has become enriched with the neo- and post- prefixes. As for the these novel varieties, it is said that at the end of the Second World War, as a result of the radical change in the global balance of power, the former metropolises – such as the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Belgium –, have left their place to dissimulated, disguised colonial actors – such as the United States of America and the Soviet Union –, the latter being continued, in intricated manners, by its post-Cold-War heir, the Russian Federation. In this paper, I attempt to explain the extent to which the characteristics of Russia’s current international relations with the former members of the Soviet Union, which have gained their independence, but live since then under constant Russian pressure, can be framed in the logic of colonial habits. Emphasis is on the Central Asia region, a place that has been the object of geopolitical/geo-economic disputes between several great powers, one of them being the ex-Soviet-imperial tutor, Russia. In order to obtain a portrayal of the Russian colonial-type behaviours, arguments of economic, political, technological or cultural substance are being provided, linking canonical scientific debates of colonialism to contextual ties among the involved stakeholders. JEL: A13; C12; C43; C55; E47 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ASEM | en_US |
dc.subject | geopolitics | en_US |
dc.subject | geo-economics | en_US |
dc.subject | colonialism | en_US |
dc.subject | imperialism | en_US |
dc.subject | neocolonialism | en_US |
dc.subject | societal challenges | en_US |
dc.title | Some Notes on the Geopolitics and Geo-economics of Russia’s Post-Soviet Neocolonialism in Central Asia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | 2.Articole |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EEJRS_0601_2020_Ioan Alexandru GHERASIM.pdf | 366.66 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.