Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorozov, Boris-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T05:32:56Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-29T05:32:56Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-27-
dc.identifier.isbn978-9975-75-845-1 (PDF)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://irek.ase.md:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/300-
dc.descriptionPublicat in: International Scientific Conference “Classical and Innovative Approaches in Contemporary Economic Thought: Considerations regarding the quality of life in the context of a changing Europe”, 2nd Edition (May 27, 2016) / Editorial Board: Elina BENEA-POPUȘOI [et al.]; Organisational Committee: Elina BENEA-POPUȘOI [et al.]. – Chisinau: ASEM 2016. – 176 p. ISBN 978-9975-75-844-4; ISBN 978-9975-75-845-1 (PDF) (pag. 56-78)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article is organised into three major logical parts. The first part (subsections Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: Origins and Essence and Public Administration and Political Science Views on Decentralization) discusses the origins of the fiscal federalism framework and the decentralisation process. This review of fiscal federalism's origins is necessary in order to establish a system of reference for analysis of decentralisation typology and process, which is the second part of this chapter (Major Elements of Decentralization and its Taxonomy). The second part of this chapter also identifies major components of the decentralisation process per se through a review of existing literature in the field. It concludes with the formulation of the first research question of this article: How can the decentralisation process properly be measured and assessed? The third and concluding part of this article (Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Summary of the Current Literature and Theories of Economic Growth) is devoted to a review of the existing literature on the relationship between a nation's degree of decentralisation and its economic performance. This section concludes with the formulation of the second research question of this article: Does fiscal decentralisation cause economic growth or is it a consequence of economic growth? The article concludes with a review of existing economic growth models.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEditura ASEMen_US
dc.subjectdecentralizationen_US
dc.subjecteconomic performanceen_US
dc.subjectfiscal federalismen_US
dc.subjectmeasuring decentralisationen_US
dc.subjectmodels of economic growthen_US
dc.titleDecentralisation and economic growth: evidence from developing countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2.Articole

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
conf_27_mai_2016_ASEM_Morozov-B.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.