IREK – AESM: Institutional Repository of Economic Knowledge

Is Sustainable Competitive Advantage Antediluvian?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kriel, Vera
dc.contributor.author Goldman, Geoff A.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-12T09:26:34Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-12T09:26:34Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6179
dc.identifier.uri https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/3431
dc.description KRIEL, Vera, GOLDMAN, Geoff A. Is Sustainable Competitive Advantage Antediluvian? Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies. June 2024, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 53-78. ISSN 2537-6179. E-ISSN 1857-436X. en_US
dc.description.abstract This article aims to understand the contemporary relevance of the sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) concept in strategic management. Mainstream management and business training perpetuates the use of SCA despite indications that it is elusive. This study intends to elucidate how, in the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) world, SCA has become irrelevant, what the possible reasons are for its continued use and what alternatives can be explored for business success. The study followed an exploratory, constructivist grounded theory approach. Data were obtained from 27 semi-structured interviews to develop a grounded theory. Findings revealed four main themes, and pronounce that in a complex, interconnected business world, SCA is mostly obsolete, which demands an organisation to adapt its strategy, business model and culture to create value, be relevant, have a significant (positive) impact and contribute to the common good. The main implication of the study is therefore that SCA should no longer be promoted as a key concept for organisational success by management and academia. Alternatives to SCA, such as agility and complexity management, are more relevant in an interconnected 4IR business environment. The study enhances the body of knowledge by bolstering the critique on the continued use of SCA in contemporary business management. It furthermore highlights potential erroneous assumptions through a direct explanation of why SCA assumptions are antiquated. UDC: [005.21:005.11]:339.137.2; JEL:L19, M19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.10-1.04 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ASEM en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies;vol. 10, issue 1
dc.subject strategy en_US
dc.subject sustainable competitive advantage en_US
dc.subject organisational change en_US
dc.subject disruptive change en_US
dc.subject 4IR en_US
dc.title Is Sustainable Competitive Advantage Antediluvian? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account