IREK – AESM: Institutional Repository of Economic Knowledge

Analysis of AIF regulation implementation in the Republic of Moldova and the Republic of Cyprus

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vostricov, Denis
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-21T09:27:21Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-21T09:27:21Z
dc.date.issued 2022-09
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-3590-6-1 (PDF)
dc.identifier.uri https://irek.ase.md:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/2634
dc.description VOSTRICOV, Denis. Analysis of AIF regulation implementation in the Republic of Moldova and the Republic of Cyprus. In: Competitiveness and Innovation in the Knowledge Economy [online]: 26th International Scientific Conference: Conference Proceeding, September 23-24, 2022. Chişinău: ASEM, 2022, pp. 452-457. ISBN 978-9975-3590-6-1 (PDF). en_US
dc.description.abstract Modern financial relationships between investors and beneficiaries evolved, seeking efficient management of financial resources. Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) gain a greater role in international financial intermediation bringing plenty of benefits for market participants and the market as a whole: flexible investment tool, lesser administrative burden, wide diversity of asset classes, favourable taxation, market diversification and others. Legal regimes are important to promote investments and the employment of AIF as investment tools. The stable operation of AIFs in many EU countries is attributed to clear and efficient regulation. The Republic of Moldova adopted the EU AIF regulatory regime in 2020 but does not register the same success as many EU financial centres. The supposition is that the law is not being implemented as expected and that there are other structural factors requiring regulators’ attention. The aim of the paper is to compare the national AIF regime with one of the successful cases in the EU and determine which factors within the compared jurisdictions may hinder the appropriate application of AIF law in Moldova. The data used for the paper are official sources, legislation and market data. The methodology is mostly qualitative based on analysis and synthesis. Findings suggest that the adoption of EU AIF-related legislation had a beneficial effect on modernising Cypris AIF regulation. In order to develop the national AIF market, it is necessary for intersectoral cooperation of regulators to eliminate structural weaknesses and create incentives for AIF application. CZU: 336.714:347.73(478); JEL: K2, K23, K29; DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/cike2022.53 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ASEM en_US
dc.subject Alternative Investment Funds en_US
dc.subject undertakings for collective investments en_US
dc.subject Non-UCITS en_US
dc.subject collective investment vehicles en_US
dc.subject AIFs’ regulation en_US
dc.subject AIFMD en_US
dc.subject asset management en_US
dc.subject structured finance en_US
dc.subject investment funds en_US
dc.subject risk-spreading investments en_US
dc.title Analysis of AIF regulation implementation in the Republic of Moldova and the Republic of Cyprus en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account