Interim measures in the English civil proceedings

Abstract

The process of reforming the justice system is a difficult and complex one, and sometimes we face situations when institutions that, despite undergoing extensive legislative transformations, nevertheless, show gaps and imperfections in judicial practice. Among these institutions is the mechanism for ensuring civil action. Thus, currently the litigants from the Republic of Moldova are frequently confronted, either with the lack of complete tools that would ensure their interests, or with the negligence or abuse of the courts in terms of ensuring civil action. At the same time, internationally, there are states that stand out for the undeniable success of the legal instruments requested by the applicant and applied by the court, which protect the interested party from possible tricks of the defendant to create difficulties in the future execution of decision. Among such states, the United Kingdom stands out, which, through the ways of ensuring the action taken, offers a panacea against the abuses of the subjects involved in obligatory relations, but also increases the credibility of the justice system in the view of the litigant. However, such models can also provide positive examples for our legal system. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/9789975155649.41; CZU: 347.91/.95(410); JEL: K41